Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 2
- Last 30 days
- 2
Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Oct 27, 2026.
Public comments (4)
A Manchaca resident on a community well said the final draft wrongly removed the 20-year-old minimum lot-size chart, weakening recharge zone protections, and suspects the change was made to benefit the Hayes Commons development.
Regular - Oct 27, 2026 · 1:49 →A Manchaca resident near the Hayes Commons site said the draft regulations are unreadable, rushed, and serve developers rather than residents, urging that water protections not be sacrificed for speed.
Regular - Oct 27, 2026 · 4:54 →At the K.1 hearing, she argued water availability reports are a mere checkbox with no testing standard, no cumulative impact analysis, and a flawed 10-day implied-consent rule, and said fixing them would block the most concerning developments including Wood Creek North.
Regular - Oct 27, 2026 · 1:46:38 →In an emailed comment, she asked for a formal comment period and transparency on changes, and urged keeping minimum lot-size restrictions to protect the Edwards Aquifer.
Regular - Oct 27, 2026 · 1:50:00 →