O
Hays County
← Community
ZoningCommunity discussion

Development regulations

Hays County

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Opposed (2)

At a glance

Public comments
2
Last 30 days
2

Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Oct 27, 2026.

Public comments (4)

OpposedCarol PenningtonOct 27, 2026

A Manchaca resident on a community well said the final draft wrongly removed the 20-year-old minimum lot-size chart, weakening recharge zone protections, and suspects the change was made to benefit the Hayes Commons development.

Regular - Oct 27, 2026 · 1:49 →
OpposedAlana BeattieOct 27, 2026

A Manchaca resident near the Hayes Commons site said the draft regulations are unreadable, rushed, and serve developers rather than residents, urging that water protections not be sacrificed for speed.

Regular - Oct 27, 2026 · 4:54 →
OpposedZane PorterfieldOct 27, 2026

At the K.1 hearing, she argued water availability reports are a mere checkbox with no testing standard, no cumulative impact analysis, and a flawed 10-day implied-consent rule, and said fixing them would block the most concerning developments including Wood Creek North.

Regular - Oct 27, 2026 · 1:46:38 →
OpposedMichelle PashellOct 27, 2026

In an emailed comment, she asked for a formal comment period and transparency on changes, and urged keeping minimum lot-size restrictions to protect the Edwards Aquifer.

Regular - Oct 27, 2026 · 1:50:00 →

News & external sources (1)